Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Date: 2009-03-10 17:47:43
Message-ID: 20090310174743.GD4406@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake escribió:

> Yes but I am also offering an opportunity for others to show up. Which
> denying the patch does not do. If we provide SE support (even with
> marking it experimental), I would wager that some Linux distributions
> would begin to test it themselves which would allow us in turn to
> benefit by taking it out of experimental. Since RH, SuSE etc... are not
> going to Patch postgresql outside of some general compatibility issues.

It was said upthread that SEPostgres is already packaged for Fedora.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-03-10 17:49:35 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-03-10 17:29:29 Re: Prepping to break every past release...