Re: small parallel restore optimization

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small parallel restore optimization
Date: 2009-03-09 02:34:15
Message-ID: 20090309023415.GP3821@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Worst case, we could say that parallel restore isn't supported on
> mingw. I'm not entirely sure why we bother with that platform at all...

I think you're confusing it with cygwin ...

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2009-03-09 04:55:33 Sampling Profler for Postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-09 02:14:32 Re: small parallel restore optimization