From: | Levente Torok <toroklev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Márton Ákos <makos999(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: help for "quick search" |
Date: | 2009-03-08 10:17:47 |
Message-ID: | 200903081117.47751.TorokLev@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sunday 08 March 2009, you wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Levente Torok <toroklev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > Thank you very much you quick and detailed answer.
> > We will try to follow your comments so I'll keep talking on hacker's list.
> > We would accept all your comments on functionality.
> >
> > Does anybody on the list know if there is possiblity to use WxTree in a way that one can disable /enable
> > of displaying specific branches or leaves?
> > Because Akos hasn't found a way to do so, hence we turned to a solution in which
> > we create a copy of the original tree containing the elements to be displayed (the search
> > result set) only.
>
> I don't believe that is possible. You shouldn't be implementing the
> search result display in that way anyway in my opinion - what you're
> implementing there is a filter, not a search. I would expect results
> to be listed in a Window, and a double-click on any row should select
> and bring the corresponding node into view on the treeview.
>
I believe it would require too much user interaction and no benefit compared to
manual search.
I suggest not even to have a search button but do filter operating
on-the-fly. This should be similar to the quick search of new synaptic (in ubuntu).
Lev
--
Blogger of http://fapuma.blogspot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-03-08 10:34:08 | Re: help for "quick search" |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-03-08 09:34:50 | Re: help for "quick search" |