poor wording on SSPI error message

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: poor wording on SSPI error message
Date: 2009-03-06 20:16:07
Message-ID: 20090306201607.GA3162@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

This message

r = (_QuerySecurityContextToken) (sspictx, &token);
if (r != SEC_E_OK)
{
FreeLibrary(secur32);
pg_SSPI_error(ERROR,
gettext_noop("could not get security token from context"), r);
}

looks poorly worded. What "context" is it talking about? Can we be a
bit more explicit? Any other thoughts on how to improve it?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-06 20:23:45 Re: libxml incompatibility
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-03-06 19:58:30 Re: libxml incompatibility