| From: | Jan-Peter(dot)Seifert(at)gmx(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ashishka(at)synechron(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: getting 'full' names of functions? |
| Date: | 2009-03-04 14:41:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20090304144122.153400@gmx.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hello Ashish, Hello Tom,
thank you very much for your quick and helpful replies - I really appreciate that.
> > May be this will help you:
>
> Easier is just
> select oid::regprocedure from pg_proc where <whatever>
I guess I'll go with the very nifty type cast suggested by Tom though as this covers aggregate functions as well. This possibility should be mentioned in the docs - together with the system information functions http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-info.html
Too bad that this function syntax isn't part of information_schema.
Thank you very much to both of you.
Peter
--
Computer Bild Tarifsieger! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
für nur 17,95 ¿/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-03-04 14:49:43 | Re: Backing up postgresql database |
| Previous Message | Carol Walter | 2009-03-04 14:26:17 | Re: Database in use? |