| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuumdb --freeze |
| Date: | 2009-02-19 13:08:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200902191308.n1JD84V00112@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> The FREEZ option is deprecated. See
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/sql-vacuum.html
I mentioned PGOPTIONS as a suggestion when I posted but on one said that
was a good idea; they just wanted to know why I needed this
functionality.
> you should use vacuum_freeze_min_age instead. On other side it breaks
> vacuumdb backward compatibility which we did not declare, but it could
> be fine.
How does adding a flag break backward compatibiity?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-02-19 13:09:44 | Re: PostgreSQL Translation - PL/pgSQL current |
| Previous Message | Jasen Betts | 2009-02-19 13:05:12 | Re: Good Delimiter for copy command |