From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
Subject: | Re: audit table |
Date: | 2009-02-17 02:36:40 |
Message-ID: | 200902162136.41183.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 12 February 2009 22:13:05 Craig Ringer wrote:
> Sim Zacks wrote:
> > I want a trigger on every table that inserts the old row into an audit
> > table (for updates and deletes). If the audit table was per table, then
> > I could easily have a field of type that table and insert old into it.
> >
> > Is there any way that I could accomplish this functionality with any
> > other type, so I could input any record into it?
>
> You want a single audit table that looks like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE audit (
> id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
> table_changed regclass,
> changed_by VARCHAR,
> changed_when TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
> oldrow ANY_ROW_TYPE
> );
>
> ie you want a field that can dynamically contain anything?
>
> AFAIK that's not possible unless you want to store a textual
> representation of the row. I'm not sure of an easy way to do it even
> then, and of course you can't read it out again as a real row.
>
> What you might want to look at doing is using table inheritance. Your
> master audit table looks like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE audit (
> id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
> table_changed regclass,
> changed_by VARCHAR,
> changed_when TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
> );
>
> and then you have child audit tables for each audited table, each of
> which looks like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE audit_tablename (
> old_row tablename;
> ) INHERITS audit;
>
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/tablelog/
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Stuckle | 2009-02-17 02:54:17 | Re: Which SQL is the best for servers? |
Previous Message | Michael Austin | 2009-02-17 00:51:51 | Re: Which SQL is the best for servers? |