From: | Tino Schwarze <postgresql(at)tisc(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum wait time problem |
Date: | 2009-02-13 22:34:53 |
Message-ID: | 20090213223453.GH12562@easy2.in-chemnitz.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:13:28PM -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
[...]
> Yeah, that's pretty bad. ~2 Million live rows and ~18 Million dead
> ones is a pretty badly bloated table.
>
> Vacuum full is one way to reclaim that lost space. You can also dump
> and restore that one table, inside a drop / create restraints in a
> transaction during maintenance if you can. A Vacuum full is quite
> intrusive, so avoid it during normal working hours. Dumping and
> reloading the whole db may be faster than either a vacuum full or a
> cluster. A common trick is to do something like:
>
> begin;
> select * into ordermydata from bigbloatedtable order by some_field;
> delete * from bigbloatedtable;
> insert into bigbloatedtable select * from ordermydata;
> commit;
>
> This will both put your table in some order which might help, and
> remove the bloat.
Really? Wouldn't that add even more bloat? How does that work? (I'd
expect a drop table/create table instead of the delete...)
Note: I suppose that you know a lot more about PG than I do, so I'm just
curious.
Thanks,
Tino.
--
"What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-13 22:40:04 | Re: Vacuum wait time problem |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-02-13 22:15:02 | Re: Vacuum wait time problem |