From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update autovacuum to use reloptions instead of a system catalog, |
Date: | 2009-02-11 19:30:31 |
Message-ID: | 20090211193031.GM8924@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>
> > I tested this changes and found two issues:
> >
> > 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have
> > toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users?
> > ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored
> > because the table doesn't have toast relations.
>
> You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored.
> Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch?
Any takers here?
The second issue has been solved.
Thanks for testing.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-11 19:36:16 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update autovacuum to use reloptions instead of a system catalog, |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-02-11 19:12:43 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update autovacuum to use reloptions instead of a system catalog, |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-02-11 19:30:41 | Re: HotStandby vs. flatfile updates |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-11 19:27:51 | Re: HotStandby vs. flatfile updates |