Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Date: 2009-02-08 23:12:18
Message-ID: 20090208231218.GA10265@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:51:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Now, if you want to argue that we should get rid of SET WITHOUT OIDS
> altogether,

+1 for removing it altogether. Row OIDs are and ugly wart :P

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-02-09 00:00:08 Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2009-02-08 22:37:29 Re: Is a plan for lmza commpression in pg_dump