From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class |
Date: | 2009-02-07 17:05:33 |
Message-ID: | 200902071705.n17H5XS17017@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Currently, catalog-pg-class is a bit confusing as to where FKs are
> tracked in pg_class. Please update the lines for relchecks and
> reltriggers to read:
>
> relchecks int2 Number of check constraints on the table (but not
> other types of constraints); see pg_constraint catalog
Uh, why do we have to say "but" when we clearly say "check constraints"?
Do we need to say "CHECK" contraints?
> reltriggers int2 Number of triggers on the table, including
> constraint-triggers for foreign keys; see pg_trigger catalog
pg_class doesn't have that column anymore, it has relhastriggers.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-02-07 19:04:50 | Re: Clarification to catalog-pg-class |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-01-28 19:18:27 | Clarification to catalog-pg-class |