Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Date: 2009-02-07 15:24:46
Message-ID: 20090207152446.GA3688@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

KaiGai Kohei escribió:

> One melancholic thing is adding a member into pg_proc.
> It defines more than 2000 of entries which I have to modify correctly. :(
> Is there any script to help it?

Try a search for "coccinelle", "sdiff", or was it "spatch"? It got
featured on http://LWN.net/ not many weeks ago.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-07 15:35:45 Re: UnixWare 7.1.4 (and OpenServer) sigwait issue
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-02-07 15:24:18 Re: New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception (REVISED PATCH)