From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables |
Date: | 2009-02-07 03:21:57 |
Message-ID: | 20090207032157.GA5451@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 18:54 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I don't see them as conflicting; I see yours as a missing feature,
> > namely the ability to add tables to an autovacuum "group", which could
> > have settings attached. Being able to do that is the whole point of
> > moving settings to reloptions.
>
> So your changes will allow these?
>
> ALTER DATABASE foo SET (autovacuum_enabled = false);
> ALTER SCHEMA foo SET (autovacuum_enabled = false);
Hmm. Perhaps being able to turn autovacuum on/off per-database is
desirable and possible, but I can't see doing it per schema.
> CREATE TABLE GROUP foo_group;
> ALTER TABLE foo SET TABLE GROUP foo_group;
> ALTER TABLE foo2 SET TABLE GROUP foo_group;
> ALTER TABLE GROUP SET (autovacuum_enabled = false);
Yes, something like that.
> Hopefully the grouping of tables is not purely related to AV?
Hmm, good question. I was envisioning it only for autovacuum, but it
hasn't been vetted on pgsql-hackers.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-02-07 05:10:24 | Re: autovacuum and reloptions |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-02-07 01:36:15 | Re: Column-Level Privileges |