Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables
Date: 2009-02-05 22:57:10
Message-ID: 200902052257.n15MvAX12500@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It'd make more sense to put the effort into developing
> >> better scheduling control over autovacuum, such as a concept of
> >> maintenance windows.
>
> > We need that as well, not instead of.
>
> I disagree; adding every frammish anyone could ever think of is not
> an overall improvement to the system.

Agreed, let's get this capability out in 8.4 and we can always adust it
based on user demand.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2009-02-05 23:38:12 Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-02-05 22:29:45 Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables