From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I: arrays and block size |
Date: | 2009-02-02 20:41:18 |
Message-ID: | 20090202204118.GJ3008@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:48:37AM -0800, Scara Maccai wrote:
> > I need to store a lot of int8 columns (2000-2500) in a table.
> > I was thinking about using int8[]
An array of ints sounds like the way to go here as you wouldn't be able
to have that many columns. TOAST is one non-obvious implementation
artifact that may cause extra work to be done and may cause confusion.
Tuples in PG can be a maximum of 8KB and hence 2000 INT8 values would
only just fit and 2500 values wouldn't. TOAST docs are available here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/storage-toast.html
> , and I would like to know:
> > 1) is there a max size for arrays? I guess I could have 1 GB "worth"
> > of values,
Not that I'm aware of; as a quick test:
CREATE TABLE arrtest ( v INT8[] );
INSERT INTO arrtest SELECT ARRAY(SELECT generate_series(1,10000000));
worked (very slowly) for me, but 100000000 failed with an out of memory
error (32bit build).
> > but I would like a confirmation
> > 2) there won't be any updates, only inserts and selects; since I
> > will be using ZFS would there be any benefit in changing the block
> > size (for example to 32K) in postgresql?
No idea, maybe someone else?
> > Would it be better to use
> > ZFS compression instead of postgresql's (TOAST)? That is: should I
> > EXTERNAL for that array column and set compression=on for ZFS? I
> > tried ZFS compression=on a 200 columns table and it worked faster
> > than with compression=off....
Oh, I guess you know about TOAST. Otherwise I can't help much, sorry!
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wstrzalka | 2009-02-02 20:46:37 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2009-02-02 20:37:03 | Re: chinese parser for text search ! |