From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Date: | 2009-01-30 21:32:44 |
Message-ID: | 200901302132.n0ULWj302990@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> rhubbell <Rhubbell(at)iHubbell(dot)com> writes:
>
> > What's your list look like? Or maybe you want everyone else to do your work
> > for you and don't have anything to share.
>
> Heh, fair enough. Perhaps I should just say you should come to FOSDEM though
> :)
>
> The usual bugaboos are things like having to do a dump/restore to upgrade,
> weak support for partitioning, no index-only-scans, etc. Things which have
> been mentioned several times.
>
> One thing which has *not* been mentioned which i find positively shocking is
> VACUUM. This was once our single biggest source of user complaints. Between
> Autovacuum improvements and HOT previously and the free space map in 8.4 the
> situation will be much improved. However there are still some common usage
> patterns where people run into problems.
Yes, that is surprising, and something most database product struggle
with.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-01-30 21:48:16 | Re: PGSQL or other DB? |
Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-01-30 21:25:35 | Re: Pet Peeves? |