From: | Reg Me Please <regmeplease(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Date: | 2009-01-30 13:37:13 |
Message-ID: | 200901301437.14048.regmeplease@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday 30 January 2009 14:26:45 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> > So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do
> > some things which rub you the wrong way?
>
> * No offer of anything-but-CVS on pgfoundry.org
>
> * Lack of REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
>
> * Too many obscure configuration options: memory management, autovacuum
> management, freespace map, background writer, WAL.
>
> * Writing robust scripts with psql is difficult and bizarre.
>
> * Default postgresql.conf is too long and verbose.
>
> * Default logging configuration is too minimal.
>
> * Difficult to trace nested things, e.g., nested PL/pgSQL calls,
> cascaded foreign key actions.
>
> * No basic health checking: Answering the question, "Is this system
> configured reasonably and running smoothly" takes two days of training
> and half a day of work.
>
> * Too much accumulated historical garbage that is never cleared out.
* No builtin crosstab a-la
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/tablefunc.html
* No builtin time intervals a-la http://temporal.projects.postgresql.org/
* LIMIT and OFFSET don't accept non-constant (or non function) values
--
Fahrbahn ist ein graues Band
weisse Streifen, grüner Rand
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-30 13:52:45 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-30 13:33:25 | Re: Pet Peeves? |