| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 21:09:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200901272309.17636.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:02:30 Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 21:36:01 Dave Page wrote:
> >> If it's been around for a year, why hasn't it been
> >> submitted long ago so we could have rewritten and reviewed etc. in
> >> plenty of time?
> >
> > It's in the commit fest listing, and the discussion about which
> > programming language to port it to happened weeks ago.
>
> It was added to the commitfest page on December 5th, and links to an
> email from the day before. The only discussion on the language I can
> see in the linked thread is David Fetter offering to rewrite the code
> in perl.
Well, the is ultimately about the same discussion we are having now, except
that people are a lot more excited when you threaten to cancel the
project. ;-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-27 21:10:11 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-01-27 21:08:42 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |