Re: pg_upgrade project status

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date: 2009-01-27 21:00:05
Message-ID: 200901272300.07036.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:54:02 Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Either way, there's no point to discuss that in detail until there
> actually is a working implementation out there... perl will do fine
> until then

There is a working implementation out there. It is -- you guessed it --
sitting in the commit fest queue waiting for review.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-01-27 21:02:30 Re: pg_upgrade project status
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-01-27 20:57:21 Re: pg_upgrade project status