From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | db(dot)subscriptions(at)shepherdhill(dot)biz |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Serial Jumping |
Date: | 2009-01-27 05:14:48 |
Message-ID: | 20090127001448.aa35061b.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
db(dot)subscriptions(at)shepherdhill(dot)biz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a table with BIG SERIAL field as Primary KEY. During high load,
> entries in the BIG SERIAL field are jumped. One could see a row with
> 1367 and expecting the next INSERT to be 1368, one would end up
> getting 1369.
>
> Please is this normal?
If transactions rollback, the serial value assigned during the rolled
back transaction is skipped. This has been discussed many times, it's
a tradeoff between losing some #s now and again and taking a huge
performance and code complexity hit to avoid it.
If you absolutely need consecutive #s, then serial is not for you and
you should implement your own method of acquiring sequential numbers.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-01-27 05:24:23 | Re: Serial Jumping |
Previous Message | db.subscriptions | 2009-01-27 04:55:48 | Serial Jumping |