From: | Michael Monnerie <michael(dot)monnerie(at)is(dot)it-management(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem |
Date: | 2009-01-26 21:27:27 |
Message-ID: | 200901262227.31752@zmi.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Montag 26 Januar 2009 Ezra Taylor wrote:
> What about XFS performance on databases larger than 1 TB. We
> are successful running postgres on zfs with x4500 but I'm interested
> using commodity hardware.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfs#Allocation_groups
XFS was designed for big iron, where "big iron" from that time is
commodity servers of today (4+ cores, 8GB+ RAM, RAID with lots of fast
disks). During mkfs, you can decide how many allocation groups you want,
and by the size of your partition, you decide how big a single AG is.
And if your database spans lots of AGs, high parallelism can take place
if it's well done.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Bear | 2009-01-26 21:42:03 | finding dev rpms |
Previous Message | Jaume Sabater | 2009-01-26 18:50:36 | Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem |