Re: Controlling hot standby

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Controlling hot standby
Date: 2009-01-23 16:28:26
Message-ID: 20090123162826.GI4047@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 11:28 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Depends on the setting :-) It is "hot_standby=off" by default, right?
> > I think having a double negative "disable_hot_standby=off" would be
> > awkward.
>
> It is on by default. Why would you want it "off" by default?

Would it slow down the normal recovery after a crash if I don't have any
slaves?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-01-23 16:34:32 Re: Controlling hot standby
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2009-01-23 16:26:14 Re: Controlling hot standby