| From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pluggable Indexes |
| Date: | 2009-01-22 09:27:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20090122092711.GA19878@tomas |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:48:21PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 00:29 +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
[...]
> > Other question, why don't improve GiST to allow support of more indexes ?
> > bitmap indexes could be implemented usin g GiST.
[...]
> I'll avoid discussing index design with you :-)
Oooh. What a pity -- this would allow us lurkers to learn a lot!
(Oh, wait, Heikki has taken up that :-)
Just wanted to say -- thanks folks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJeDvvBcgs9XrR2kYRAviLAJ4jW1rSygrgeA4M73PerFqWXmO4NACeNvV8
GSSnxUyCroSrvpF2PBevBV4=
=jhqe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-01-22 09:30:51 | SE-PostgreSQL on Linux.conf.au 2009 |
| Previous Message | Amit Gupta | 2009-01-22 09:16:13 | Extension of Thick Indexes |