Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))
Date: 2009-01-21 23:49:24
Message-ID: 200901212349.n0LNnOp16882@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > It is cost vs. benefit. No one is saying plugabiity is bad, only
> that
> > in this case it is more costly than beneficial
>
> Just curious -- are we talking execution time costs or programming
> costs because of increased code complexity?

Programming, I assume, and the chance of bugs.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-21 23:56:54 Re: Frames vs partitions: is SQL2008 completely insane?
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-01-21 23:46:30 Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))