| From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Ja??kiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | paulo matadr <saddoness(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| Date: | 2009-01-21 14:06:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20090121140623.GG14570@it.is.rice.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:55:28PM +0000, Grzegorz Ja??kiewicz wrote:
> there's no real limit (its size is described with 32bit number, and
> that's the only limitation here).
> But you need to be aware, that content is sent over at once, so memory
> is the limit in your case.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-binary.html
>
> For such large objects, it might be actually better to store them
> separate as files, and just store file name.
>
The TOAST implementation however only allows 30-bits for the
size of the TOAST entry which caps the size at 2^30 or 1GB. I
agree that he could very well be limited also by the memory on
his system.
Cheers,
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-21 14:09:01 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-21 13:55:28 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-21 14:09:01 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |
| Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2009-01-21 13:55:28 | Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? |