From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1403) |
Date: | 2009-01-14 19:14:15 |
Message-ID: | 20090114191415.GA14162@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:52:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:05:45AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> pgace.h: you have a bunch of "static inline" functions in here. As far
> >> as I know this doesn't work in compilers other than GCC :-(
>
> > Really? C99 requires it and MSVC does support it.
>
> Wrong. What C99 requires is a uselessly cumbersome form of "inline"
> that is not compatible with the GCC feature. We did actually implement
> C99-compatible inlines in one or two places (in the sorting code IIRC),
> but it's not something that I want to put up with on a large scale.
I was talking about "static inline", where C99 agrees completely with
GCC and is significantly more portable.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lawrence, Ramon | 2009-01-14 19:36:22 | Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-14 18:45:11 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1403) |