From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PgUS 2008 end of year summary |
Date: | 2009-01-13 12:25:50 |
Message-ID: | 20090113122550.GA4005@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe escribió:
> In this thread getting a bounce from advocacy won't bother me too
> much. Having hundreds ot bounce messages in a busy thread, would be
> much much worse.
Yup.
> I wonder, if all the mailing lists are run by the same software,
> wouldn't it be easy enough to have a kind of passthrough filter for
> other mailiing list? You can post to them in addition to the ones
> you're subscribed to, knowing you'll get the thread back by reply to
> semantics and no one need get a bounce message. At most a "we've
> secretly moderated your post into pgsql-xyz, let's see if they notice
> you're not really a member of their mailing list" reply. And / or an
> auto approval message into the group you're posting into?
Yeah, there is a way to configure lists this way in Mj2. We only have
to get Marc to play along ...
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2009-01-13 17:48:53 | Re: Users group on a map |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-01-13 04:18:58 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PgUS 2008 end of year summary |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Schröder | 2009-01-13 13:50:49 | Polymorphic "setof record" function? |
Previous Message | Emanuel Calvo Franco | 2009-01-13 12:19:21 | Re: Trying to create implicit casts to text in PG 8.3 |