Re: Buffer pool statistics in Explain Analyze

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Buffer pool statistics in Explain Analyze
Date: 2009-01-09 00:30:16
Message-ID: 200901090030.n090UG128730@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > What did you want done with this patch? It is unlikely we want to see
> > those counters by default, and we have had little demand for them.
>
> >> Here is a patch that adds "buffer pool statistics" to the explain analyze
> >> output revealing the number of buffer pages hit at each and every execution
> >> step.
>
> This was already rejected in connection with pg_stat_statements, no?

You know, I thought we discussed it as part of that patch, but the
author was Vladimir Sitnikov, not the pg_stat_statement author, Alex
Hunsaker, so I am just checking.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-09 00:36:13 Re: Improving compressibility of WAL files
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-01-09 00:12:42 Re: Improving compressibility of WAL files