Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, I did, and now I see why you said there might be only a few broken
> > cases. But I did not see any documentation in the standard saying that
> > was OK:
> > http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#escaping
>
> The example on that page is just bizarre. If the first asterisk
> has to be escaped to prevent it being taken as markup, why doesn't the
> second have to be? I suppose it's because there's no "closing" asterisk
> to match it, but that's not the sort of thing one ought to depend on.

So what would this show?

\*escape* \*escape*

Want to bet the second word it italics.

> > so it might be that your ReST interpreter is broken.
>
> Looking at this I'd say the ReST standard is broken, or at least expects
> unreasonably complicated behavior. But anyway, it's quite clear that
> there are *many* cases that need escaping, not only backslashes.

Yea, there doesn't seem to be enough information on that page to form a
standard behavior.

Ah, OK, here is where we should be looking:

http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html#reference-documentation

URL updated on TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +