Re: stat() vs cygwin

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I'm confused. There is a Cygwin member of buildfarm, working quite
> >>>> happily. Can you point me to the exact patch in question, please? I
> >>>> thought we resolved the matter of stat() ages ago.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4865F707.6010702%40x-ray.at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> That patch is NOT about $subject. In fact, if you read that whole thread
> >> you will see here
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-06/msg00915.php that I
> >> conducted a test on Cygwin and found it was not suffering from the
> >> problem we fixed on WIN32.
> >>
> >> AFAICT Reini's patch is about fixing OpenSSL and possibly some other
> >> options on Cygwin. It was rejected because it had other problems, but is
> >> not indicative of a fundamental problem on Cygwin. There is no reason I
> >> am aware of that we should declare Cygwin no longer supported, no matter
> >> how much its continued existence apparently annoys a few people :-) .
> >>
> >
> > Oh, good, thanks for clearing that up. So should we just document that
> > OpenSSL doesn't work on Cygwin and call this item closed?
> >
> >
>
> This item should be closed. We should see if Reini can submit an
> acceptable patch for OpenSSL.

I have documented that OpenSSL is not supported for Cygwin.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +