From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, 506196(at)bugs(dot)debian(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Debian Bug#506196: postgresql: consume too much power when idle (>10 wakeups/second) |
Date: | 2009-01-05 16:09:49 |
Message-ID: | 200901051609.n05G9n401456@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I think we must blame bgwriter then. I had a look at it some time ago
> > to how hard would it be to remove the useless wakeups and concluded that
> > it wasn't really worth the trouble.
>
> I've got similar complaints in the RH/Fedora bugzilla. It's hard to fix
> in a portable way because of the lack of consistent select/poll
> semantics across various platforms. See my previous notes about the
> lack of consistent EINTR behavior and whether we should really be using
> SA_RESTART.
>
> The short answer is "don't hold your breath". It'd be nice to have a
> plan for improving things though.
Is this a TODO?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomáš Dixa | 2009-01-05 16:48:04 | Problem with instalation |
Previous Message | Lee McKeeman | 2009-01-05 15:03:08 | Re: Status of issue 4593 |