Re: pg_pltemplate entries for external PLs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_pltemplate entries for external PLs
Date: 2008-12-31 12:00:55
Message-ID: 200812311400.56417.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 31 December 2008 05:50:19 Tom Lane wrote:
> That was part of the original concept for pg_pltemplate, but IIRC there
> was push-back from some folks who thought it was a bad idea.  I don't
> recall what their arguments were exactly;

Basically, we have no information about what the proper parameters of external
languages would be. (We have some pretty good ideas, but that's not the
same.) Especially if we override the trusted/untrustedness, we could create
complete disaster.

Ultimately, as we add more loadable facilities (languages, plugins/modules,
foreign-data wrappers), we will need a better upgrade mechanism anyway than
maintaining our own override list of everything in the world. So let's just
leave this mechanism restricted to the built-in languages for now.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-31 12:02:12 Re: TODO items for window functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-12-31 11:51:44 Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits