From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WITH AS vs subselect was: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation |
Date: | 2008-12-27 07:10:43 |
Message-ID: | 20081227071043.GC3793@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 07:13:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> writes:
> >>> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> >>>> In 8.4, you'll be able to do:
>
> >>>> WITH d AS (
> >>>> SELECT DISTINCT c1, c2 FROM table1
> >>>> )
> >>>> SELECT count(*) FROM d;
>
> >>> Nice, but what will be the difference from
> >>> select count(*) from (select distinct c1, c2 from t);
> >>> ?
> >>> Optimisation?
>
> >> None especially.
>
> > So what would be the advantage compared to subselect?
>
> None, David just has WITH on the brain ;-)
LOL!
You're only saying that because it's true ;)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-12-27 09:14:15 | Re: "disappearing" rows in temp table, in recursing trigger |
Previous Message | J Ottery | 2008-12-27 05:47:39 | Bind message has 6 results formats but query has 5 columns |