From: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | WITH AS vs subselect was: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation |
Date: | 2008-12-26 22:17:06 |
Message-ID: | 20081226231706.264a1de8@dawn.webthatworks.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:04:48 -0800
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 08:03:30PM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> wrote:
> > > > aggregate_name (DISTINCT expression [, expression] )
> > > In 8.4, you'll be able to do:
> > > WITH d AS (
> > > SELECT DISTINCT c1, c2 FROM table1
> > > )
> > > SELECT count(*) FROM d;
> > Nice, but what will be the difference from
> > select count(*) from (select distinct c1, c2 from t);
> > ?
> > Optimisation?
> None especially.
So what would be the advantage compared to subselect?
> > Furthermore... I was actually looking at docs because I needed to
> > find a way supported by both postgresql and mysql
>
> Generally, it's *not* a good idea to try to support more than one
> back-end. You wind up maintaining several disparate code bases,
Not really my main target... I was just investigating if it could
come for free ;)
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-27 00:13:48 | Re: WITH AS vs subselect was: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-12-26 21:10:08 | Re: lack of consequence with domains and types |