From: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation |
Date: | 2008-12-26 19:03:30 |
Message-ID: | 20081226200330.35c5e191@dawn.webthatworks.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:43:25 -0800
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:34:33PM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> wrote:
> > I noticed that starting from 8.2 the documentation at
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/sql-expressions.html
> > say that multiple distinct expressions are supported
> >
> > aggregate_name (DISTINCT expression [, expression] )
> In 8.4, you'll be able to do:
> WITH d AS (
> SELECT DISTINCT c1, c2 FROM table1
> )
> SELECT count(*) FROM d;
Nice, but what will be the difference from
select count(*) from (select distinct c1, c2 from t);
?
Optimisation?
Furthermore... I was actually looking at docs because I needed to
find a way supported by both postgresql and mysql and I've heard
that mysql is not that good at subselect and I doubt it supports
WITH AS. (OK not really a postgresql problem...).
Meanwhile what would you suggest as a general approach to stuff like
select count(distinct c1, c2) from t;
regardless of mysql support?
and considering mysql support?
I was thinking to find some way to exploit group by, but I didn't
come to anything useful yet.
> and very likely an OLAP version. :)
What's "an OLAP version" of WITH d AS...
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-12-26 20:04:48 | Re: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-12-26 18:47:06 | Re: count (DISTINCT expression [ , ... ] ) and documentation |