From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs |
Date: | 2008-12-17 22:47:57 |
Message-ID: | 20081217224757.GX26318@it.is.rice.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 05:42:41PM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hot Standby won't work with hash indexes because they are
> > non-recoverable.
> >
> > We have a number of ways of dealing with this:
> >
>
> i don't see a reason for inventing the wheel, we don't have wal for
> hash indexes because makes those more slow without any benefit at
> all... now there will be one...
>
> --
> Atentamente,
> Jaime Casanova
> Soporte y capacitaci?n de PostgreSQL
> Asesor?a y desarrollo de sistemas
> Guayaquil - Ecuador
> Cel. +59387171157
>
I think having your index survive a server power outage or other
crash is a very good thing. Rebuilding a hash index for the case
for which it is preferred (large, large tables) would be excrutiating.
Ken
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2008-12-17 22:51:26 | Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-12-17 22:42:41 | Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs |