| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com, "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
| Date: | 2008-12-16 20:58:15 |
| Message-ID: | 200812162258.16948.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 15 December 2008 23:56:08 Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > You can't compare DBT2 with TPCC. They're not the same benchmark.
>
> Agreed. Somewhere earlier in the thread I mentioned that the OSDL
> kits are non-spec-compliant, a little buggy, and sometimes give better
> results than the real tests.
Could we consolidate everyone's concerns into a project outline, if one is
necessary?
- Everyone would like to have a TPC-like benchmark kit.
- OSDL script are not compliant.
- OSDL scripts are outdated/appear unmaintained.
- OSDL scripts need POstgreSQL-specific improvements.
- EnterpriseDB is apparently maintaining their own fork.
What can we do?
I found the TPC-C spec on the web, so it's freely available for
implementation, it appears.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-12-16 21:01:00 | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |
| Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-12-16 20:30:58 | Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle |