Re: Vacuum Problems

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Rafael Domiciano <rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum Problems
Date: 2008-12-16 21:38:41
Message-ID: 20081216213841.GS4741@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Rafael Domiciano escribió:

> 2008/12/9 Rafael Domiciano <rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com>
>
> > Maybe Could be Check-Points? I have changed the parameters sometime ago.
> > Follow:
> > effective_cache_size = 200MB
> >
> > checkpoint_segments = 40 # in logfile segments, min 1, 16MB
> > each
> > checkpoint_timeout = 3min # range 30s-1h

checkpoint_timeout 3 minutes? I think you want to increase that a lot.

> > Now I'm having the following problem on vacuum:
> > vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "Postgres" failed: ERRO: multiple active
> > vacuums for index "PartInd_replicacao_historico_sl_log_2-node-1".
> >
> > But there's no anymore vacuum running.

Something's very wrong here. This shouldn't ever happen. I haven't
followed this thread but you really should investigate this.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-12-16 22:06:53 Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-12-16 19:33:14 Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax