From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: new list group |
Date: | 2008-12-04 02:51:45 |
Message-ID: | 200812032151.45578.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 15:52:27 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:41 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Not objecting but what is the definition that you are using for the
> > > grouping?
> >
> > The associations go into the Associations group. The current Regional
> > group keeps the language-specific lists.
>
> Seems a weird break out but it certainly isn't going to hurt anything.
>
Don't forget to add spi, that too is an association for postgresql related
activities.
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-12-04 09:15:51 | PITR for people.planetpostgresql.org |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-12-03 20:52:27 | Re: new list group |