From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new |
Date: | 2008-11-28 22:08:42 |
Message-ID: | 200811290008.42720.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 28 November 2008 17:13:54 Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Matching *only* as the first character will make it impossible to make
> certificates for "www*.domain.com", which is AFAIK fairly popular - and
> one of the examples you'll find on CA sites. But it would be fairly easy
> to add this restriction if people feel that's a better way.
Are there actual technical or administrative or security arguments for or
against this? For example, what are the criteria one has to fulfill in order
to get such a certificate? Or is there a "defensive certification" security
line of reasoning?
Now certificate issuing is a real business, so we need to play in that context
as well, but I would like to dig a little deeper why things should be done in
a certain way.
I am quite confortable, for example, with * matching subdomains, because if I
own example.com, then I can create any level of subdomain I want, without
making a real difference to user/client program. But then I don't really get
the point of having * inside of words -- would "www*.domain.com" also match
dots then?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-28 23:47:52 | pgsql: Partial fix for fallout from temp-port changes. |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-11-28 21:24:31 | Re: pgsql: Reduce risk of accidentally running temp-install regression tests |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-11-28 22:13:14 | Re: HEAD build failure on win32 mingw |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-28 22:07:32 | Re: Fixing contrib/isn for float8-pass-by-value |