From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
Date: | 2008-11-27 12:04:03 |
Message-ID: | 20081127120402.GC4586@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Nikhil Sontakke escribió:
> The status has always being WIP, because what has not happened is that we
> have not had consensus on whether this is a logical first baby step ahead
> with partitioning. I haven't seen core members commenting on whether trying
> to aggregate the current set of manual operations together via this approach
> is worth spending further efforts, to get it into commitable shape.
There was a lenghty, interesting discussion about this topic in the
developer meeting in Ottawa.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2008_Developer_Meeting#Partitioning_Roadmap
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Koichi Suzuki | 2008-11-27 12:04:43 | V2 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-27 12:00:39 | Re: Thread safety |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-11-27 13:07:51 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
Previous Message | Nikhil Sontakke | 2008-11-27 09:06:16 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |