From: | Tino Schwarze <postgresql(at)tisc(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-11-27 09:20:04 |
Message-ID: | 20081127092004.GC7442@easy2.in-chemnitz.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:13:41PM -0700, Fabricio wrote:
> I have an IBM server with NUMA architecture, two nodes with 4 CPU quad
> core and 64 GB of RAM each, and PostgrSQL 8.3.5. Is there any way to
> avoid the performance degradation when the load goes up and used the
> two nodes? I understand this performance degradation is due to the
> higher latency than a cpu access a remote memory that the local
> memory. But there are ways to improve this?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-04/msg01187.php
>
> Any suggestions? Greetings... Thanks...
I suppose this has nothing to do with PostgreSQL but needs some
operating system level tuning. Maybe there is a way to bind the postgres
processes to one node's CPUs... What operating system are you using?
I know that there are ways to bind processes to a CPU on Linux, I'm not
sure how to assign multiple processes to multiple CPUs. The Linux
scheduler should know about NUMA architectures though, there not that
new any more.
Tino.
--
"What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-11-27 10:04:50 | Re: NUMA architecture and PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Abdul Rahman | 2008-11-27 07:43:25 | Re: PgAgent Job Scehduler is NOT running |