Re: WIP: default values for function parameters

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Date: 2008-11-24 21:28:58
Message-ID: 20081124212858.GG3861@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule escribió:
> 2008/11/24 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> > Say again? The representation Peter is suggesting *is* what is used
> > in rules and views. If you've re-invented that wheel, undo it.
>
> Then I am blind. I store serialised transformed expression, but if
> better solution exists, then I'll use it.

Seem to me you just want to store the output of nodeToString.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-11-24 21:30:14 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-11-24 21:26:41 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new