From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cool hack with recursive queries |
Date: | 2008-11-23 03:34:21 |
Message-ID: | 20081123033421.GH3813@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> WITH RECURSIVE Z(IX, IY, CX, CY, X, Y, I) AS (
> SELECT IX, IY, X::float, Y::float, X::float, Y::float, 0
> FROM (select -2.2 + 0.031 * i, i from generate_series(0,101) as i) as xgen(x,ix),
> (select -1.5 + 0.031 * i, i from generate_series(0,101) as i) as ygen(y,iy)
> UNION ALL
> SELECT IX, IY, CX, CY, X * X - Y * Y + CX AS X, Y * X * 2 + CY, I + 1
> FROM Z
> WHERE X * X + Y * Y < 16::float
> AND I < 100
> )
> SELECT array_to_string(array_agg(SUBSTRING(' .,,,-----++++%%%%@@@@#### ', LEAST(GREATEST(I,1),27), 1)),'')
> FROM (
> SELECT IX, IY, MAX(I) AS I
> FROM Z
> GROUP BY IY, IX
> ORDER BY IY, IX
> ) AS ZT
> GROUP BY IY
> ORDER BY IY
FWIW you can halve the running time by restricting I to 27 instead of
100 in the recursive term, and obtain the same result.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-23 03:43:22 | Re: portability of "designated initializers" |
Previous Message | V S P | 2008-11-23 03:04:48 | [Q]updating multiple rows with Different values |