Re: Custom variables and flags, again

From: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Custom variables and flags, again
Date: 2008-11-17 02:03:42
Message-ID: 20081117105915.81F2.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Perhaps more to the point, guc_tables.h is a file that we don't even
> want the majority of the backend including. Why would we think it's
> a good idea to make that part of the public API to external modules?

Hmmm... do we need to move config_group enumerations to guc.h from
guc_tables.h ? Or, we cannot expose the group field and always use
CUSTOM_OPTIONS for custom variables.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-17 02:07:43 Re: Custom variables and flags, again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-17 01:54:23 Re: Custom variables and flags, again