Re: gram.y => preproc.y

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:57:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep preproc.y
> > if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem to be
> > an advantage.
>
> Other than whether it *works*, you mean?
>
> make will not be happy if it has a dependency from preproc.c to preproc.y
> and preproc.y is not there. Please don't mess with this.

It doesn't complain but rebuild preproc.y which makes no sense at all. Removed
preproc.y from make clean.

Michael

--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!