| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: array_agg and array_accum (patch) |
| Date: | 2008-11-14 00:08:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20081114000844.GO4062@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> The original reason for doing this work, I think, was to let us
> deprecate contrib/intagg, or at least turn it into a thin wrapper
> around core-provided functionality. We now have the means to do that
> for int_array_aggregate, but what about int_array_enum?
And what about the patch to add sorted-array versions of some routines?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-11-14 00:32:27 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-14 00:06:37 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |