Re: gram.y => preproc.y

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: gram.y => preproc.y
Date: 2008-11-13 20:47:30
Message-ID: 20081113204730.GA17142@trantor.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:10:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> clean distclean:
> ! rm -f keywords.c *.o ecpg$(X) preproc.y
>
> Actually, we want to fix it so that preproc.y is treated like preproc.c,
> ie, it's part of the shipped tarballs even though it's no longer in CVS.

That's what I did first, but Magnus had a good reasoning to not keep preproc.y
if we keep preproc.c in our tarball. And I agreed that there doesn't seem to be
an advantage.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-13 20:57:49 Re: gram.y => preproc.y
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2008-11-13 20:20:46 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard