From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO wiki display issue |
Date: | 2008-11-12 20:29:04 |
Message-ID: | 20081112202904.GM4535@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Brendan Jurd escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > I mentioned this to Bruce because I noticed that somebody edited to add
> > a new subsection, and neglected to add the {{TodoSubsection}} marker.
> > Since a week had passed and nobody had noticed, I thought that maybe
> > those things are a waste of time and space and we should just get rid of
> > them and the indentation they provide.
>
> Well, you may recall that my original port of the TODO into the wiki
> didn't have indentation. Bruce felt that indentation was important to
> delineate the subsections, so we added it in.
>
> So, unless Bruce has changed his mind about that I think the
> indentation is here to stay.
Well, that's exactly my point. I showed Bruce the other version of the
page and he wasn't sure he could tell the difference, so I'm not sure
that keeping it is all that important :-)
If people add new subsections and they don't notice that you need a
macro to fix the indentation, this clues that the indentation is not all
that useful.
> Plus we've already put in the effort to get it working. =)
That's a point, yes :-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-11-12 20:42:00 | Re: TODO wiki display issue |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-11-12 20:25:55 | Re: TODO wiki display issue |