From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4. |
Date: | 2008-10-28 21:40:52 |
Message-ID: | 200810282140.m9SLeqn04648@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
> > I'm happy with the idea of a readahead process. I thought we were
> > implementing a BackgroundReader process for other uses. Is that dead
> > now?
>
> You and Bruce seem to keep resurrecting that idea. I've never liked it -- I
> always hated that in Oracle and thought it was a terrible kludge.
I didn't think I was promoting the separate reader process after you had
the posix_fadvise() idea.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-28 21:56:55 | Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4. |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-10-28 21:25:40 | Re: PostgreSQL + Replicator developer meeting 10/28 |